Skip to content

Question themes

Ethics scenarios, and the topics they come from.

Most circuits have at least one. The scenario changes every year, but it is drawn from a short list of topics, and knowing the list takes the surprise out of it.

Why schools ask

Doctors make decisions with no clean answer every week. A school wants to see that you can stay calm in one, see who is affected, and reach a position you can defend out loud. Nobody expects you to know medical law. The marks are for thinking fairly.

The domain page on ethical reasoning covers how these stations are marked. This page is about the subjects they are drawn from.

Worth knowing before the interview

  • Consent and capacity. An adult with capacity can refuse treatment, even treatment that would save their life. Capacity is about a particular decision at a particular time, and it is assumed unless there is reason to doubt it.
  • Confidentiality. What a patient tells a doctor stays private, with narrow exceptions where someone else is at serious risk. Most scenarios turn on whether an exception applies, and on trying to get the patient’s agreement first.
  • Young people. A person under eighteen can consent to some treatment on their own if they understand it well enough. Australian law calls this being a mature minor. It is why a GP can see a fifteen year old without a parent.
  • Professionalism. Scenarios about colleagues: an error someone will not admit, a friend who cuts corners, a gift from a drug company. They test whether you will put patients ahead of loyalty, and whether you know to raise it with someone senior first.
  • Fairness and scarce resources. Who gets the last bed, the expensive drug, the next transplant. The useful words are need, benefit and fairness, and the useful habit is asking who else should be part of the decision.

What a strong answer shows

  • The people first. Name who is affected and how they might feel before you reach for principles.
  • Both sides, fairly. The best version of the view you end up rejecting.
  • A decision, with its conditions. What you would do, and what would change your mind.
  • Help sought. A medical student or junior doctor escalates. Saying who you would talk to is part of the answer.

Where answers go wrong

  • Treating it as a quiz. There is rarely one right answer, and an interviewer can tell when a student is hunting for the one they think is wanted.
  • Overconfident law. Half-remembered legal rules said with certainty. It is safer to say what you would want to check, and with whom.
  • Acting alone. Heroic answers where a student confronts a consultant or breaks a rule on their own judgement. The safer and better answer goes through the right people.

Three prompts to run on the clock

Thirty seconds to read each one, then two minutes to answer it out loud. Record it if you can, and listen back once.

  1. A patient with capacity refuses a blood transfusion that would very likely save their life. A junior nurse asks whether the team should give it anyway. What do you say?
  2. A friend in your year asks you to sign them in to a compulsory tutorial they are going to miss. What do you do?
  3. A patient asks their GP not to record a diagnosis in their file because they are worried about their job. How should the GP respond?

What these stations usually mark

Schools where it matters most

A station on the same ground

Other themes

Other guides

If you want a session

Thirty minutes, $40, online, and it comes off any package you go on to book. Tell me which schools you are applying to and which of these worries you.

Book an intro session