Skip to content

Question themes

Public health, and health beyond the clinic.

Questions about what keeps a whole population well: smoking laws, vaccination, junk food, housing. They test whether you can see past the patient in front of you.

Why schools ask

Most of what decides how long people live happens outside a clinic. Income, housing, education and where you grow up shape health more than any single treatment. Doctors are asked to treat the results, and good doctors also speak up about the causes.

These stations are often policy questions. Should something be banned, taxed, funded or made compulsory. They are marked like an ethics station: both sides, then a position.

Worth knowing before the interview

  • The social determinants of health. The conditions people are born, grow, live, work and age in. They explain why health follows wealth so closely, even in a country with universal health care.
  • Prevention is slow and cheap. Its benefits arrive years later and are spread across many people, which makes it hard to fund and easy to cut. Tobacco control is the usual example of it working.
  • Rules and freedom pull against each other. Most public health questions are a trade between protecting people and letting them choose. Seatbelts, sugar taxes and vaccination requirements all sit somewhere on that line.
  • Trust is part of the treatment. Health advice only works if people believe it. Misinformation spreads faster than correction, and how doctors speak in public matters.

What a strong answer shows

  • Looking for causes. Asking why a problem is common in one place and rare in another.
  • The trade-off named. Who gains, and who pays for it, in money or in freedom.
  • How you would know. A sense of how you would tell whether a program worked.

Where answers go wrong

  • Ban it. The reflex answer to every harmful product, with no thought for who it hurts or whether it would work.
  • Lecturing. Answers that blame people for their own health and stop there.
  • One fix. A single campaign offered as the solution to a problem with many causes.

Three prompts to run on the clock

Thirty seconds to read each one, then two minutes to answer it out loud. Record it if you can, and listen back once.

  1. Should junk food advertising be banned during children’s television and online viewing hours? Argue both sides, then decide.
  2. Why might people in a poorer suburb die younger than people in a richer one when both have Medicare?
  3. A celebrity with a large online following shares a claim that a common vaccine is dangerous. What, if anything, should doctors do about it?

What these stations usually mark

Schools where it matters most

Other themes

Other guides

If you want a session

Thirty minutes, $40, online, and it comes off any package you go on to book. Tell me which schools you are applying to and which of these worries you.

Book an intro session